BMX Bars for Michel’s 1994 GT Corrado

Vintage GTs with BMX bars are a vibe. Triple triangle frames are iconic and high-rise bars emphasise their BMX heritage. It’s not just about aesthetics though. Let’s examine how BMX handlebars can be used to adapt ’90s MTBs for taller riders.

Mountainbikes in the 1990s weren’t as optimized for off-road riding as they are today. They still shared a lot of DNA with road bikes, specifically when it comes to frame geometry. They had steep head angles, slack seat angles and long, horizontal toptubes. Today that special blend of geometry is sought after for commuter and gravel bike conversions because of its versatility. One effect of that geometry however is a relatively streched out riding position.

Michel is 191cm tall and fell in love with a red ’94 GT Corrado. On paper the 22.5″ frame should have been a good fit, but GT’s sizing is a bit decepetive here, as the seattube extends higher from the toptube than the headtube. This Corrado has a 57cm seattube with a relatively short 14cm headtube. You’d usually expect the front to be a centimeter or two higher.

BMX bars on a Mountainbike?

Tall BMX riser bars can help raise the front of any bike for a more comfortable fit. In an ideal world, Michel would have sized up, but while larger GT frames do exist, they are incredibly rare. I’m about as tall as Michel myself however, and I ride a 1991 GT Avalanche in the same size as this Corrado. I knew from experience adapting the fit to a more comfortable position was possible.

The goal was to get the grips to roughly the same height as the saddle. Bike fit is always a balancing act. When the bars are too low, there’s too much weight on the wrists. If they’re too high, the weight shifts to the seatbones. It’s important to consider how the bike will be used as well. An aggressive drop is great for climbs and races, but an upright position is more comfortable, let’s you see more of your environment and makes it easier to lift the front wheel.

Bike fit is a complex topic but at least for these sort of projects having the bars level with the saddle is usually a good starting point. The final fit can always be fine-tuned later with stem spacers and bar rotation.

Raising the Bar

There are different ways to increase the height of the bars. Stem spacers are one option, but unless the fork has an uncut steerer, it tends to be hard to gain any meaningful height with them. A riser stem could be another solution, but short, steep and tall ones are hard to find, and making those look cool can be a challenge in itself.

70mm riser bars usually work well for a lot of builds but we needed twice that amount of rise here. Most BMX bars are around 200mm tall however, which would have been way too much. Renthal Moto bars come in four sizes, and the 140mm version was a perfect fit for this project. They’re also made of alloy and a lot lighter than most steel alternatives at just around 600 grams.

Bar Rotation VS. Reach

The 50mm stem used for this build might sound reasonably short on paper. However, because of the vertical handlebars the bike handles as if it had a 70 or 80mm stem. That’s because rotating the handlebars forwards effectively lenghtens the stem. While that is true for all riser bars, this effect becomes a lot more pronounced with tall BMX bars.

See my attempt to illustrate this phenomenon below. Spot the difference? A few degrees of bar rotation can have a big effect.

Frame & Build Highlights

Originally I was tempted to keep this frame for myself–not just because it’s red. GT had fallen in love with u-brakes for a while, only to return back to cantilevers in 1993. The evolution of mountainbike technology is a history of errors. As u-brakes and cantilever brakes use different mounts, I’m locked into using a u-brake on my 1991 Avalanche. With cantilever mounts on this 1994 Corrado we were able use stronger v-brakes front and rear.

The double-butted True Temper GTX tubing used for this frame comes with some interesting custom details. Most visible is the classic triple triangle with its dropped seat stays. The toptube is ovalized on both ends and the rear brake and shifter cable are routed semi-internally in the the ‘Groove Tube’, a small channel running on the underside of the downtube. You can tell a lot of extra steps were taken during the design and manufacturing process.

All black components were a priority. As the frame was in mint condition, I didn’t want to distract from it with shiny parts. The golden crossbar on the Renthal bars was also powder coated black to match the rest of the build.

The drivetrain is a mix of 1×10 XT and Deore. I’ve found 11-36 cassettes to be the sweet spot for our local area. A 38-tooth chainring up front let’s you keep up on the cycling paths along the Danube river and can still be easily spun up the hills surrounding Vienna.

This Corrado is a build close to my heart and I’m happy to know it’s in good hands. The Renthal Moto bars actually used to be on my own bike. I gave them to Michel for this rebuild, after changing to slightly lower S&M bars on the Avalanche. I had just switched to a longer Surly Troll fork at the time, and didn’t need as much rise anymore.

Rider & Bike

Michel with their BMX GT MTB.

Parts List

Frame: GT Corrado (1994)
Rims: Rigida Zac2000
Hubs: Shimano Deore
Tires: Maxxis dth 2.3
Stem: KCNC Flyride (50mm)
Bars: Renthal Moto BMX (5.5 rise)
Grips: DMR Deathgrips
Brakes: Shimano T-4000
Levers: Shimano Deore
Derailleur: Shimano XT 10-Speed
Shifter: Shimano XT 10-Speed
Cranks: Shimano XT
Chainring: Deckas 38t
Cassette: Shimano HG50 11-36
Saddle: EC90 155mm

All photos by Anna Breit. Words by Christoph Wimmer.

Responses to “BMX Bars for Michel’s 1994 GT Corrado”

  1. Nice article. Loved to read it! Although I cannot agree a 100% when it comes to handlebar angle and reach. As I rode a lot of BMX Bikes and tried many different handlebars it was always very crucial how the bar was angled to ensure a proper handling of the bike. In general I found the best angle was putting the rise of the bar somewhere between parallel to the fork up to aiming for the front axle. In the end it‘s very personal and it should feel good. Nevertheless I do not recommend substitute reach witch handlebar angle. Thanks for the article, I‘m looking forward to read more about neoretro tech and hope to find discussion about this topics in here.
    Jakob

  2. Hey Jakob, thanks for commenting, glad you liked the article!

    I agree with you about not using handlebar roll for reach, usually, as it effectively lengthens the stem and short stems are just plain better with wide bars. Roughly matching the angle of rotation with the head angle is a solid way to preserve the stem length, and would also be a good look.

    However, in this case the bike felt really short set up that way, knees were getting a bit close to the handlebar when steering. Just tall people problems. The handling is good now, but if the bars were any wider, it’d be too slow.

    Planning to write more articles soon! Cheers

  3. No mention of what’s going on with the fork and stem situation? Seems pretty critical for a 90’s bike that comes with a threaded quill. Did you install a threadless fork and paint match it?

    1. The 1994 Corrado came with a threadless fork, you can see it in the before picture in the article. That’s the original fork and headset.

  4. I have a fawn affection for the classic GT bikes. I think it comes from my younger years, drooling over them. The look you have created with these two classics is fresh and inspiring. Such that I am inspired to build my own. There is a “too small” GT Talera in the garage that I started building today ironically, taking cues from your builds.
    I would love to see you build a classic anodized GT, they had some awesome colours that I feel you could build a real show stopper with.

    Thank you; Jay Rodman. Sutton, Ontario Canada

    1. Thank you, Jay! I agree that the anodized GTs are really cool, they’re also really rare though. I’d love to see how your Talera build is progressing!

Leave a reply to Jay Cancel reply